Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Arms Race Chronicles: The Ant Edition

Among the many ant species living in Eurasia are Myrmonexus ravouxi. Scientists call this species dulotic, or “slave-making”, because Myrmonexus kidnap broods of other ant species, bring them back to their own nests and raise the hostages to feed, groom and defend the Myrmonexus brood. Temnothorax longispinosus is the species most often targeted by the slave-making Myrmonexus.

As expected, Temnothorax are under strong selective pressure to evolve parasite-resistant adaptations, just as Myrmonexus are under pressure to overcome such resistance. These mutually competitive host-parasite relationships, which sometimes escalate to so-called “evolutionary arms races”, are an important aspect of coevolution. 

In order to effectively resist parasitic intruders in their colonies, Temnothorax hosts need a way to distinguish between “friends” and “foes”. They do so by analyzing the cuticular hydrocarbon profile, which is the array of chemicals found on the surface of the ant’s body. Intruder Myrmonexus have within their hydrocarbon profile various compounds that are unpleasant to host Temnothorax, who in turn use this chemical signature to identify the parasites. Once they have identified an intruder, Temnothorax aggressively bite and eject it from the colony. In response to this adaptation from the host, parasitic Myrmonexus constantly alter the chemical signature of their bodies by, among other things, adapting the hydrocarbon profile of Temnothorax they had previously captured.

A team of scientists led by Dr Olivier Delattre tried to identify how effectively the Temnothorax are able to guard their nests against parasites. Several dozen ant colonies were observed, including Temnothorax sub-species that did and did not experience frequent parasitic attacks from the slave-making Myrmonexus. The scientists hypothesized that Temnothorax, if they are to keep up with Myrmonexus in the coevolutionary arms race, must act much more aggressively towards parasitic intruders than ants of other Temnothorax subspecies. 


According to the team’s results, Temnothorax do, in fact, react more aggressively towards Myrmonexus in their nests, and they make the distinction based on the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of the intruders. However, a significant portion of ants that were aggressively bitten and ejected by Temnothorax were actually fellow Temnothorax sub-species from a different colony.

The following explanation could be offered for the large number of non-parasitic ants attacked by Temnothorax: it is possible that at this point in time Myrmonexus are, in fact, ahead in the arms race, having adapted their hosts’ chemical signature to such a degree that even Temnothorax have trouble distinguishing their kin from the slave-makers. The team proposes follow-up studies that would track both the social behavior and hydrocarbon profiles of Temnothorax and Myrmonexus to find out whether the hosts will be able to perfect their ability to discriminate against parasites while keeping their own kind safe.

Word count: 444
Source cited:  Delattre, Olivier, et al. "Do host species evolve a specific response to slave-making ants?" Frontiers in Zoology. 9.38 (2012).
Image Source: National Geographic

3 comments:

  1. this is interesting. I have read a bit about how the slaves will act to sabotage their masters and have been known to kill infants in the nurseries. I wonder where their violent tendencies toward the young come from?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's interesting to see how closely species will interact and influence the other's evolution! If the scientists' hypothesis that the ants are currently experiencing evolution, it will be really interesting to see the consequences of the host species' evolution on the survival of the slave species and the two species' symbiosis.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It is very fascinating how these two species of ant are constantly having to evolve to better assure their survival in their shared environment. Perhaps another reason why the Temnothorax even attack fellow Temnothorax sub-species has to with better ensuring the safety of their own particular colony. Since altruism in the wild is usually only limited to family members, it is not overly surprising that the Temnothorax would attack those they consider to be outsiders. This would especially hold true for those sub-species that are not frequently attacked by the Myrmonexus, as their defense mechanisms might not be as advanced. This in turn could lead to a potential weakness in the colony, making the Temnothorax more susceptible to Myrmonexus attack.

    ReplyDelete